Ok, I am apparently being unclear. What Upchuck did is wrong. I am not making excuses for that. I merely was commenting that he will, in all likelihood, try to excuse his actions by saying that he was giving the photographer exposure. He did include the name of the photographer below the photo.

This does not in any way excuse his actions, and putting his own watermark on the photo is beyond wrong, and the photographer is totally within his rights.

I’m going to make pear crisp, as apparently I suck at communication today.