re: #20 Sergey Romanov

Because most people don’t lose all of their documents.

But some do. It’s not an exception. It happens with great regularity.

A proven voter shouldn’t have a right denied. Back to square one: what proves him to be a voter?

No, dude. This is begging the question. Nobody should have their right to vote denied. The desire to have people prove their identity is in support of that right— so that that right isn’t compromised by others.

What I’m saying is that once a person shows that he is who he is, he can vote. A person who didn’t show this forfeits this right, I don’t see it as a matter of it being trampled.

And why isn’t showing who they are by stating that they are that person and matching a name on the voter rolls enough?

One possible scenario might be operatives registering people to vote and thus knowing their data; then coming to the polling places early, making sure that there is no CCTV, and not overusing the fraud in any of the polling stations so as not to arouse too much suspicion, etc. I’m sure there are more scenarios, depending on circumstances.

This is still a large conspiracy of people. And you still need an equal number of people to fraudulent votes. At most, you’re going to be able to drive over to a couple of polling stations— which negates the ‘coming early’ part. And even if you do come early, maybe the real voter does too— and he is told “That guy right there just voted as you”.

We have had investigation after investigation that has shown this simply doesn’t happen. Is there some reason you think those investigations were faulty?

If you have any information about any problems, let me know.

And if you have any information about voter fraud in the US being a problem, let me know.