re: #20 LudwigVanQuixote

The flip side of that is:

Scientists have been warning about this loudly enough for the past 50 years that the Wall Street Journal has felt compelled to protect it’s business reader’s feelings and financial interests over the realities of the science.

Remember the first paper on AGW came in 1896, and the first this is a serious problem report to the president from the NAS came in 1964.

1896?
What paper?