re: #237 researchok

No.

Ehrman remains controversial because he tells evangelicals what they believe.

They don’t all appreciate that.

Is he being descriptive, as in, “About the beliefs of evangelicals in such and such county”? Then again, nothing wrong with it. If he says what they should believe, can you give an example, because I’m pretty sure he would do no such thing, as it would be rather pointless and he’s a smart fellow.