re: #241 Jimmah

‘Offending a man’, in this case, by being attractive and dressing attractively for TV? Sorry Ludwig, but in my world, women are allowed to do this without being called whores and sluts. If the attractive woman in question is broadcasting bigoted crap, that is very sad. But she’s still not a slut.

And if there is a criticism to be made about Fox’s hiring of ‘dolly birds’ then that justifies an attack on Fox and their hiring directives, it still doesn’t justify an attack on the women themselves, or make such attacks remotely acceptable.

Ok you are dear friend but you are being an utter jerk with your straw men.

The offense is not being attractive. The offense is not being on TV.

No I rather clearly defined multiple times in dozens of ways that what offends me is:

Women who degrade themselves and others (including other women) by using their sexuality to push evil propaganda. Even from just a feminist view, do you consider he Fox women to be a step forward or a step back for women’s rights? What hypocrisy!

who espouse views you disagree with
WTF Jimmah? Just disagree with? They are actively using their bodies to help sell an agenda that you yourself consider pure evil! And it is pure evil. There is no question.

WTF?

This is not just disagreeing!

What I see from this clearly is indoctrination from the other side.

Exploiting people is bad. Using sexuality to exploit people is bad. It is bad whenever men or women do it. However it seems to me that you are arguing that women can’t be held responsible for when they do it.

They should be ashamed in this case.