re: #241 Charles

“Defensive?” Not at all. My attitude is “dismissive.” This story is so insignificant, the denial industry should be embarrassed as much as (or more than) the CRU scientists.

That may be your opinion, but when a scientist urges other to delete emails, and says quite clearly they will delete information rather than divulge, in full recognition of the law requiring such disclosure, then it should be investigated.
I happen to agree with Cato in the above post. I think both sides are lying, so I’d like to see an investigation clear it all up.