re: #242 Gus 802

I have no idea about ISNA, as far as I’m concerned they may be closet Jihadists, for all I care. But this unindicted co-conspirator bullshit is absolutely annoying. It doesn’t mean a fucking thing beyond that someone decided to mention another someone as a co-conspirator. It’s a non-issue legally. The “unindicted” is the key part here. Legally, unindicted=innocent. Extralegally, this may raise an eyebrow or two, but by itself it’s not evidence either - one must analyze the prosecutor’s intent in naming someone an u.c-c.