re: #214 Cato the Elder

“OK. I have to run. Anyone who can tell me what that sentence means in a way that does not violate all laws of logic, grammar and rhetoric gets free Cato updings on your next 100 comments, regardless of whether I agree with you or not.”

No one commenting on this bill is licensed to practice law in Uganda and therefore is not qualified to comment on it is how I read that.

That being the case, why did he feel the need to comment on it?

That’s right, he wasn’t. He was calling Charles Intellectually Dishonest.