re: #18 Charles Johnson

This case is a troubling one, and I think a particularly dangerous one for those that hope Obamacare can be given a fair shot. To me however I believe that the problem could be solved pretty simply. If a private company wishes to opt out of a particular aspect of coverage for religious reasons, they should have to pay a fee, or tax, whatever you choose to call it to the government in lieu. In turn the government can provide coverage for that aspect of the insurance this company refuses to provide. It is pretty simple. The owners can have clean hands so to speak but must accept that employment law requires certain standards be met, and if you cannot meet them for some reason, you have to provide for them to be met somehow else.