re: #21 calochortus

The problem I see with this interview is that Rachael Maddow is quite polite and lets Inhofe put out a bunch of claims without asking too many questions about them. I’d be willing to bet the anti-AGW folks think he wiped the floor with Rachael. Inhofe manages to come across as well informed and backed by by science. She does a bit better with the facts on the Uganda portion.

I can’t watch the video. Can’t imagine this guy wiping the mat with anyone. What kind of science does he have backing him?