re: #257 LudwigVanQuixote

And by defending the abuses of women in this regard you are also part of the problem I am referring to by pretending it does not exist.

What problem, Ludwig? You keep changing your mind about what your problem IS! Everytime someone objects to one point, you’re off claiming you meant something else.

The problem *I’ve* been addressing, and you keep refusing to engage with— and defending! after backtracking yesterday— is your insistence that it’s somehow not sexist and degrading for you to use sexist and degrading terms for women *you don’t like*.

Now you appear to want to claim that you were using those words to draw attention to —what, exactly? The plight of women on Fox News?

As pointed out on the other thread, every single excuse you gave for using those words has been shot down.

Wrenchwench made a good post on your thread about some of the other issues people are having understanding whatever the point is that you wish to be making. I think it’s worth you thinking about.