re: #260 iceweasel

NO I haven’t changed one bit. My very first post on the matter had multiple points. All of those points actually intersect and are facets of the same issue.

Please, read the first post. I was really elaborate about what I was talking about.

In the end I am opposed to manipulation of people into hurting themselves or others. Sexuality is very good at being used that way. The Fox women were one example.

Then everything went non-linear in response to how I described them.

I reject your assertion that using a negative word for a woman means it implies all women. Not one bit.

Not all women do this stuff in this way. Not all men do either. However, the larger structure of manipulation is ever present. It is done by both sexes. It leads to very bad things. It is always wrong.

OK…

Not all men are only think of one thing. This is a great example of your point and one of mine intersecting. Fox news assumes that all men are that way and will be that dumb implicitly in their approach. I find that insulting. I was pretty clear about that too.

I was also pretty clear at how disgusted I am at the men on whom it does work.

Those types of guys are throwbacks who only think with their peckers. That is not a good thing. It is rather the male analog of the sorts of women I am describing because they both need each other to finish the cycle.