re: #250 Cato the Elder

I’m sorry, Cato, but your definition of Truism is simply wrong. It does not matter how it’s stated— the definition of a truism is something that is not profound.

If what you are saying is profound, it is by its nature not a truism. That’s what the word, you know, means.

I apologize if I offended you by saying your arguments weren’t new, but they aren’t.

And you really should read Dennett, at some point. Maybe you will also conclude he’s also a solipsist, but you should give yourself the chance.