re: #227 WindUpBird
You like to fight for no reason. I have already agreed we have no disagreement. My response was to this:
re: #165 celticdragon

Possibly not, but the fact that it (Lawrence, followed by gay marriage)has been successfully used as a diversionary wedge issue doesn’t support that. Rank and file Republicans (and an awful lot of other folk, to be fair)are perfectly willing to believe that absolute worst about GLBT people. Can you think of any other group that has their marriages actually voted on?? Who else would frakking stand for it?!

Also, note the Pavlovian response anytime the SCOTUS rules in a way that the social conservatives don’t like.

Black Robed Tyrants! Revolution! Wolverines!!!

Note, Celtic Dragon did not specify about the Supreme Court or voting againt vs for. The last sentence seems to stand alone and is even set apart with “also”. Can you see why I did not think that is what was meant? When CD responded with clarification, I responded in kind. I am not in disagreement with the senitment. Are you assuming otherwise? Now, if you want references, you are going to have to give me more than a minute at it takes forever on my computer/connection.