re: #242 cliffster

I’m not sure what to say. Walter made the claim that he’d show errors in the code that produced inaccurate results. He hasn’t done so. That some of the datasets— some of the instrument records— were problematic or in error everyone knew already. Walter’s claim was about the code at CRU producing inaccuracies through bugginess— which he’s done nothing to prove.

re: #260 albusteve

Why do you think that is, Steve?