re: #21 calochortus

The problem I see with this interview is that Rachael Maddow is quite polite and lets Inhofe put out a bunch of claims without asking too many questions about them. I’d be willing to bet the anti-AGW folks think he wiped the floor with Rachael.

Commenters on ClimateProgress seem to agree:

Having a near-professional anti-science climate denier is a mistake…no one except a climate literate comedian should “debate” a denier since professional deniers are so fluent at lying and obfuscating that there is no way an individual can keep up with debunking or even keeping straight their lies and misrepresentations. Only a comedian can come back with appropriate absurdities.