re: #26 Elias

You haven’t answered to my other comment. It’s much easier to attack the person than to actually read and judge the article. Huge crime, he wrote about Terror and Liberalism, that means he must be an awful Islamophobic neocon.

It’s not an article, it’s a book review. It’s a set of anecdotes about a set of anecdotes. Why do you favor it over the article linked above, which uses a large enough set that it qualifies as data? You say we’re all liberal and naive. I say you boldly assert what you believe is truth, but with little or nothing to back it up.