re: #256 Dark_Falcon
And you’re saying he shouldn’t be able to do that? That he should be restricted in where he can travel to and to whom he can speak?
Maybe I’m reading you wrong and if I am I apologize, but I really need you to clarify what you’re arguing here.
Expenditures and contributions damn well should be limited when it comes to political activities. This is self evident. The only reason this is a live issue in the US is because of decades of blatant judicial activism by the Supreme Court to drive this money = speech madness.