re: #228 blueraven

This is interesting

Broad opposition in the new poll contrasts with a December Post-ABC poll that found most Americans saying they would be supportive of U.S. action if Syria used chemical weapons. At that time, 63 percent supported U.S. military involvement when it was a hypothetical situation, while 30 percent were opposed.

Indeed. I wonder what all made the difference? The situation in Egypt? Realization that there are no Good Guys in Syria? Or the difference between a hypothetical “If/Then”, and being faced with the ‘If’ being true and having to deal with the ‘Then’?