re: #268 Gus

Not seeing any neo-Nazi rule in Croatia.

Bosnia was a neo-Nazi puppet state during WWII because their other option was getting exterminated by the Nazis. Also, German was THE Nazi state during WWII. Why does Bosnia have this burden to bear while Germany is all innocent and good? Three neo-Nazis in Croatia in 1993 means something? While Germany is still ripe with neo-Nazis? Does this mean something? I’m a little confused here. Also, while we’re back on perfect and happy clean Europe. Europe is swarming with far more right wing lunatics sitting in parliaments who make our Republicans look like liberals.

Why are you ignoring the fact that the PRESIDENT OF BOSNIA who declared independence was an SS man? I mean he was an active supporter of the SS regime in Bosnia so maybe the Bosnian Muslims were forced to be pro Nazis as you excuse them but the president of Bosnia at that time was one of those that was a collaborationist with the Nazis. That was from the New York Times. How are you OK with? Or is that not a fact you expected from me to cite as to why I was/am hostile to the Bosnian Muslim Bosniac regime and thus you can’t counter it?

Do you deny that Bosnia’s ruler was a supporter of the SS Handzars per the claim of the New York Times obituary? Does it not bother you this SS past was not reported during the time when he was alive by the American press? I was in Europe at that time and the Bosnian Muslim president’s pro Nazi past was well known and reported. But not in the so called American press. This was news to you right now wasn’t it?