re: #266 Escaped Hillbilly

You like to fight for no reason. I have already agreed we have no disagreement. My response was to this:
re: #165 celticdragon

Note, Celtic Dragon did not specify about the Supreme Court or voting againt vs for. The last sentence seems to stand alone and is even set apart with “also”. Can you see why I did not think that is what was meant? When CD responded with clarification, I responded in kind. I am not in disagreement with the senitment. Are you assuming otherwise? Now, if you want references, you are going to have to give me more than a minute at it takes forever on my computer/connection.

I believed you were comparing the plight of gay people, who are having their rigths limited by direct democracy, to other minority groups, whose rights were established by laws created by legislature, NOT direct democracy.

If you are not doing that, and you acknowledge that gay people are being singled out for drect democracy (remember, civil rights for blacks would NEVER have passed a direct popular vote, it had to be forced on the South by the fed. Complete with the nat’l guard protecting desegregation of schools.) then yes, we are in agreement, and I apologize for coming on strong.