I think this is important enough to make the hijack here. Referencing last night’s posts from downthread: y’all, the rights of citizens of the United States in regard to United States actions stand even when they are outside the nation’s borders. The defining case is Reid v Covert.

You may - you DO in many cases - disagree, but it is the law of the land as it stands.

Note that this does not say that foreigners in foreign lands who are subject to US actions get full benefits. They get some but not all. The more under our control they are, the more benefit they receive.

But if you are a US citizen the United States - directly or through agents - cannot ignore your constitutional rights.