re: #21 calochortus

The problem I see with this interview is that Rachael Maddow is quite polite and lets Inhofe put out a bunch of claims without asking too many questions about them. I’d be willing to bet the anti-AGW folks think he wiped the floor with Rachael. Inhofe manages to come across as well informed and backed by by science. She does a bit better with the facts on the Uganda portion.

That’s what I was concerned about. When are rational people going to start realizing this isn’t a game? It is deathly serious. I don’t care if he’s a doddering old fool, Imhofe is dangerous and evil.