re: #228 Charles

There really is going to be a limit to how much support for extremism I allow to be posted at LGF, by the way.

Pardon my ignorance, but as a Canadian, I am amazed that there seems to be a concensus that a US citizen without security clearance has the right to be armed withn range and in the presence of the President.
Is this really the law of the land?
If so, how can it be called extremism?
If not, how can the secret service expose the POTUS to this risk?
I just don’t get it - it seems almost schizoid.