re: #268 johnnyreb

Yep just like the peer review and consensus on the hockey stick by Mr. Mann for global warming. Peer reviewed by about 25 scientists and still considered one of the biggest hoaxes of the global warming movement.

I cringe when people say the words “peer reviewed” and “consensus” in regards to science, they have been truly corrupted.

Well, I don’t care if you like it or not. It is a valid process that helps shake out the fluff and the junk. Does it always work, no, does it work most of the time, yes, and it also is something that a scientist needs to consider before he or she publishes.

Of course, Johnny, you never address my actual comment about the natural state of fossils, their preservation nor any of the points in the article itself. I suspect you know very little about the nature of fossils themselves, or else you would find the original statement that I was addressing ludicrous.

You example does not diminish the science. Address the science Johnny.