re: #290 b_sharp

Satt, we only have one way to communicate, so we have to draw inferences from things like updings and down dings as well as questions and statements.

Gus’s comment implied we were ignoring information.
Up dings commonly indicate agreement.
You up dinged Gus’s comment.
I inferred you agreed because you have access to that information.

That rough syllogism isn’t uncalled for or illogical.
If it’s wrong then just say so and I’ll adjust my question.

Moral support. I (re)entered the thread shortly before Gus posted that. From the tonality of it i surmised that the discussion had been ongoing and he saw (as he stated) “it’s accepted as fact from start to finish.”, meaning he had seen no criticisms. I figured he’d be downdinged hard, so as stated, a little support