re: #294 Ayeless in Ghazi
The strongest case you could make ‘against’ what Gus said is “fake but irrelevant”. He didn’t make a “fake but accurate” argument. You and SFZ saying he did doesn’t make it so.
Can you see how Gus’s remarks could be taken as a defense of ‘fake but accurate’, though? He focuses on the suffering in Gaza, says the video likely isn’t a fake, then goes and advocates involvement by Jimmy Carter. Those things put together are often seen by those who have defended past “Pallywood productions” as ‘fake but accurate’.
If you think that’s not what Gus is saying, I’ll take your word for it, but I ask that you understand why others might think as they do.