re: #12 francis

There is no freedom of speech or expression on this site.

The First Amendment doesn’t mean what you think it means. It says:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Congress shall make no law…. That means the federal government shall make no law prohibiting or abridging any of the things that follow. It does not apply to private citizens or organizations.

I know I’m wasting my time as you seem to prefer wallowing in your ignorance to dealing with uncomfortable realities, but I’m going to post this anyway in case someone else is reading who might be inclined to give credence to your inanities: What does free speech mean?

re: #16 francis

Maybe the owner of this site has more vision than you do and recognizes that so called wing nuts like me have some worth.

Or maybe he recognizes the value of allowing you to repeatedly display, through your Pages, the utter ridiculousness & dishonesty of those Americans who live in the wingnut bubble, in constant denial of easily verified facts and full of self-righteous pride in their abject ignorance.

re: #25 francis

Obama to Boehner, Reid is sending representatives to the conference to confer on the CR and Debt bill. Have your people there. If you don’t show up we will proceed without you.

FFS, you still don’t get it. They cannot proceed without them, that’s not how our government works. You must not read any of the links we provide. Your willful ignorance is staggering.

Now the onus is on Boehner, but if you remember right, he did this, but he had stipulations. That doesn’t mean they could not have discussed the CR and Debt bill.

The onus is already on Boehner and the radical right-wing TP faction that’s behind this stupid, thuggish, and wholly selfish stunt.