re: #275 I’m back in the USSR (sigh)

I think during one of the earlier outrageous outrages it has been established that Soros gives money to Tides not as some blanket sum for all purposes, but for specific purposes. So claiming that just because Kimberlin’s org was getting money from Tides, it has also been getting Soros’ money is simply untrue. Maybe he was getting Soros’ money (without any intent to sponsor an ex-terrorist, of course) but that needs to be proven, not asserted.

In my limited exposure to the wealthy giving $ to causes, the $ always seems to come with strings and stipulations as to how it is spent.

The New Media has done very well turning Soros into a smear. Pretty shameful. The worst he’s done I’ve seen is be wealthy and some sort of leftist. As if that were a crime. The accusations that he ‘destroyed currencies’ didn’t have any basis.

I still don’t understand why Soros? There are other wealthy political donors on the left.