re: #308 goddamnedfrank

Apparently she paid off a male costar for initiating a sexual encounter with him when he was 17. Can’t defend her because he was underage but the story is also kind of fucked up because details of the released documents (a letter between her lawyer and her that the victim would never have had access to) make it clear the story wasn’t leaked by her victim, who hasn’t said anything and isn’t talking. So, whoever leaked the story bypassed his agency once again and made something public he doesn’t seem to have wanted made public.

Whoa, so there’s an obvious agenda that’s behind this release from the looks of it.

Does his feelings matter at all??