Comment

Was Rep. Weiner's Account Hacked? The Question is Irrelevant

316
Buck6/02/2011 2:12:18 pm PDT

re: #314 Obdicut

I have no clue what you’re talking about. Checking email could be what he is actually doing.

But not one of the choices I gave him.

No, I’m saying it’s a risk, but that I, personally, if I had the cell phone pointed at me, wouldn’t really care or notice.

Right arguing it both ways. You are saying that allowing people to use a camera phone in a locker room with people dressing is a risk that they might get their picture taken when they don’t want it, AND if you had a cellphone camera pointed at you in a locker room, while you were undressed, you wouldn’t care or notice.

Well, now that you realize that you are not the only person in the locker room, and that the risk is that the guy might be a pedophile….what is your opinion now?

Because it seems weird to me that you would continue to defend the use of a camera phone under those circumstances.

I am clearly opposed to it…. You seem to be saying you wouldn’t care.

Is that right?

————————————————-
Oh, and in case I wasn’t clear earlier…. when I said that I thought your arguments were in the same style and as crazy as truthers and birthers….I don’t want you to think I don’t think you are crazy.

I do. I actually think you are a serious nut ball.

For a whole bunch of reasons. Not just your position that I have to allow for the possibility that there is a crotch shot of me on the net somewhere, only because I have changed in a locker room. Although that is a good reason to think you are crazy.

Now I am not a mental health professional, so it is just my opinion.