re: #308 Charles

What the hell are you talking about?

Exactly what I said… CAN is nuts but most on the RR are going to somewhat agree re homosexualism etc.. and creationism to a degree.
So is CAN a freek occurence for the RR? probably not, so I’m asking is any portion of the RR, any leading figure that would be pallatable or credible to cohabitate space with on a topic you might agree with them on, Islamic Fundamentalism etc…