re: #326 Obdicut

Every definition I’ve been able to find that isn’t sympathetic to the truther’s point of view defines a truther as someone who believes the US government was complicit in the 9/11 attacks, not someone who simply believes it was a possibility.

I would add that with a qualifier, like “serious possibility”/”plausible possibility”, I think it is fair to call such a person a truther - merely because they may be seriously entertaining such an idea (though maybe hesitating to fully embrace it). But only with a qualifier.