re: #30 retired cynic

A lot of the talk today is that the Steele dossier is unproven or proven to be a “pile of crap.” Is that so? I am not hearing any pushback against that, and I thought that it was unproven material when he pulled it together, but that a lot of it had been verified. Am I that out of touch?

Parts of it proven, parts of it unproven, parts of it disproven. Like you would expect of raw intelligence product, as I understand it.