re: #326 calochortus

That would not be the point.
A company has chosen not to support someone who has been promoting their company who has been been attacked by their customers. I’m sure it is perfectly legal to let her go. That does not make it right.

I may be misinterpreting your posts, but what I’m hearing is, “Yeah, she was treated poorly, but there’s money involved here, so that’s more important.”

She was treated poorly, she responded in kind, and the company decided that it was easier to cauterize the wound. Right or wrong from a societal standpoint, that’s what they did.