re: #341 Anymouse
Nope. In both campaigns (Thompsonās and Ossoffās) the Republicans immediately tied them to the Democratic Party and its policies. That argument from the DCCC was ridiculous: the GOP will always tie a Democratic candidateās run to the party, just as the Democrats will to a Republican candidate.
Which is what makes Bernieās bullshit all the more glaring, that he picks and chooses who is āestablishmentā and who isnāt. And how youāre sitting here, trying to make the case for how heās a better guy than the DCCC because at least heās supporting some. Why isnāt he supporting all of them if the DCCC is nowhere to be found?
As for that fifty-state strategy? Great idea, when do we start? Unless there is some double-secret plan here I donāt understand, not supporting your candidates isnāt a fifty-state strategy.
Last I checked, the DCCC isnāt running one. But tell me, even if they were, how much do you think each candidate would need to win? Can you lay down a dollar amount that would give every candidate a fighting chance? Not just in BFE, but in every single race across the nation.