re: #347 Nyet
In which case my response (which was about the evidentiary value) still applies. Time is always an issue, but several old corroborated testimonies investigated by a journalist weigh more than a single as yet uncorroborated and uninvestigated old one. Time is less of an issue for them. They are not equal. So HW bringing this up was not an example of a double standard.
Last comment about the dang comment.
It was not my intention to say he did. Do you not understand cautioning that we don’t make it a double standard? Can you not understand why I brought it up based on how Happy wrote his comment? I saw him leaving an opening and I wanted to make sure it was clarified and he wasn’t making it an excuse.