The New York Times is out there reinventing what it means to be ratioed pic.twitter.com/8WyFToBRS4

— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) June 4, 2020

The NYT editors believe it is their job to “challenge” its liberal readers by printing any piece of right-wing drivel they can find. They also seem to think it is their job to determine a narrative for every story, which needs to incorporate the right wing drivel, so guess what the narrative looks like. The editors don’t feel the same need to “challenge” its right wing readers (or figure that grudgingly publishing the actual facts is challenge enough).

At some point, the NYT editors might point out that the First Amendment doesn’t mean that right wing members of the government get to say whatever they fucking want on any platform they fucking want without criticism. That’s actually the exact opposite of the First Amendment.