re: #315 Aceofwhat?

no. i’ll stop. i am not saying that LVQ is arguing in bad faith. i am saying that if “good” is persuading others to see the light, then at times like this there is little “good” to be had.

no one wants to engage a hostile, prickly, haughty, hyperbole-prone evangelist. even if they’re likely more right than wrong.

Take your concern and stuff it. You stated out claiming my predictions were not borne out by the science and called a skyhook alert and then when it was demonstrated that you did not read or understand what was presented to you and that there was yet more evidence to counter your false claims and understanding, you got all “concerned.”

Bring science to a science debate or shut up. I really do not care to pump up your ego when you wrongly shoot your mouth off.