re: #357 lawhawk

Yet if you believe this guy (and the anti-AGW folks are jumping on his bandwagon), the whole thing about AGW is bunk and overestimating the effects. I wish LVQ was here to debunk this nonsense fully.

Kid A posted that article last night. Here’s my reply (in short, David Evans is a lying fraud with no climate science credentials to speak of).

That garbage was published over a month ago, however - why is it getting traction now? “Drudged” up?