re: #365 KGxvi
That is, of course, unless they couldn’t prove the second part, which is at least simple assault of a federal employee. In which case, they had to go with conspiracy, and perhaps could not prove that they intended to impede federal employees in a way that would have led to at least a simple assault? In which case, there had to be a better provision to charge them under, at least criminal trespassing?
I just don’t know.