Comment

House Republican Chairman Praises Limbaugh, Beck

380
AJStrata10/23/2009 10:14:27 am PDT

re: #342 zuckerlilly

zuckerlilly,

Excellent citation there (still to swamped to get back into this with data). I also cited counter arguments to the alarmists’ claims.

The point being quite clear - the science is not settled and that makes the claims nothing more than working hypotheses (with lots of holes in them).

My point still stands (and I will get back to it as soon as possible): There is no support for the accuracies claimed going back 50, 100, 1000 and 2000 years. What I will be showing later is how the modern error bars do not grow (as they should) as we travel back in time and we loose a lot of precision. Once the actual error bars are applied there is no way to claim current temperature trends are unique or dramatic.

If they are not unique or dramatic it CANNOT be due to the undeniable rise in CO2 levels.

What strikes me funny is foolish people like Luwdig Von Beck who call people ‘liars” when they bring forth cogent counter arguments. Ludwig is a pretend scientist because of his inability to maturely participate in the scientific method of debate, counter debate, etc.

“liar” is just his version of “I don’t want to know”!