re: #348 pat

Yes, but I do not believe this is real science. This is light weight science designed to prove a political philosophy. This is AGW science. There is no other side. I can cite articles regarding the funding of politically correct science versus real hard science in this country, but I really don’t want to. I will simply state that if you do not get the results the politicians want, you will not be funded again. That is how it works with the Feds.

How do you explain GW’s early rejection of the global warming science he later accepted. Recall the fuss Hansen at NASA made about his

efforts

If NASA wanted funding why didn’t they sway the science to make the POTUS happy.