re: #390 Daniel Ballard

I once made an argument not rooted in animus. Even windupbird admitted I was not a bigot at the time, quite a concession at that heated moment. My point at the time (before I changed my mind) was that same sex bonds were different enough from opposite sex life bonds that a different ceremony was called for. Something that was more unique to celebrate gay culture, unburdened of tradition between opposite sex mates. My point was a positive one. All the legal rights would happen just like a straight licensed marriage.

It’s still a separate but equal argument, burdened with the entirety of the awful history of that phrase. Guessing you see that now.