Comment

Trump's New Campaign Leader: The Man Behind Alt-Right Hate Site Breitbart "News"

393
KerFuFFler8/17/2016 3:27:24 pm PDT

Don’t know if others have posted this, but I read that Scientific American decided that Trump was such a bad candidate that they would not remain silent. They do not usually comment on politics but they realized this cycle is different.

In a rare move, Scientific American’s editorial board has taken a stand against GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s “antiscience” views, including his denial of man-made climate change and pledge to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency.

Trump “has repeatedly and resoundingly demonstrated a disregard, if not outright contempt, for science,” wrote the Scientific American editors in an editorial that will be published in the September 1 edition of the magazine. The editorial noted that Scientific American is “not in the business of endorsing political candidates,” but is taking a stand for science this year because the current presidential race “takes antiscience to a previously unexplored terrain.”