re: #390 Walter L. Newton

Harris is a hero, CRU and their legacy data is pitiful.

Walter:

Results are shown in the following figures. The key points: both Set A and Set B indicate warming with trends that are statistically identical between the CRU data and the raw data (>99% confidence); the histograms show that CRU quality control has, as expected, narrowed the variance (both extreme positive and negative values removed).

How is their data pitiful, if it matches the raw data so well?