Comment

David Horowitz Begs for Money for Robert Spencer

407
elbruce8/27/2010 10:23:45 pm PDT

re: #387 NJDhockeyfan

You can almost hear the extreme outrage if this had been reported 2 years ago. This report will be pushed to the back pages in a couple days if not already.

Outrageous rulings have been handed down for quite a long time now with not nearly enough outrage.

From the link:

But supporters of the decision see the GPS trackers as a law enforcement tool that is no more intrusive than other means of surveillance, such as visually following a person, that do not require a court’s approval.

“You left place A, at this time, you went to place B, you took this street — that information can be gleaned in a variety of ways,” said David Rivkin, a former Justice Department attorney. “It can be old surveillance, by tailing you unbeknownst to you; it could be a GPS.”

He says that a person cannot automatically expect privacy just because something is on private property.

“You have to take measures — to build a fence, to put the car in the garage” or post a no-trespassing sign, he said. “If you don’t do that, you’re not going to get the privacy.”


It shouldn’t matter where the car was parked, whether in your garage, driveway or on the cub. It’s your car. They shouldn’t be allowed to attach things to it or mess with it in any way.