re: #402 Scottish Dragon

Parliamentary systems have more stability according to observers since one party has all the levers of power and is accountable to the voters for everything. The party in power gets their chance to do their whole agenda and if they screw it up, so be it.

(rest cut).

Parliamentary systems are subject to a party with nearly complete control having to make coalitions with fringe parties to get power.

In the case of conservatism, since gaining and maintaining power is the only goal, you get things like the UK’s Conservative coalition with Northern Ireland’s DUP, Israel’s Likud coalition with fringe religious parties, or Canada’s Progressive-Conservatives under Stephen Harper aligning with parties such as the Reform Party and Wildrose.