re: #414 kirkspencer

12 rows. Not 8. see the affidavit’s item 7 here. Yes, I was incorrect in saying 1 and 18. The actual rows are 16 and 28.

And that is beside the point. The point is the man is not yet convicted.

Apparently I’m not making myself clear enough.

Even if the witness had been in the adjacent seat, firing this man for the allegation is wrong. Destroying his life over just the accusation is wrong.

Because if it’s right then it is right to use innuendo and false accusation to destroy someone.

If it’s right, then Breitbart’s video-editors are right. James O’Keefe is right.

And I think that’s wrong.

Like I said before, the company may not be surprised by this accusation at all. He may have a history of doing really jackass things, but maybe not enough that they felt they could fire him for it. This could have been just what they were waiting for.