It is not a matter of “assuming” anything about you. It is merely a response to your own words —- particularly your insinuation that we should consider that proposition that Brenner might be dishonest. This is somebody you don’t know and have never spent one millisecond researching.

Also, your immediate characterization of the JBS as “racist” even though I am willing to bet that you have never actually engaged in any significant conversation with a JBS member or sympathizer — and you have never carefully examined the historical record — which is not subject to your absolutist criteria.

re: #38 Obdicut

I’m sorry, but your assertions about what most rational beings do or not do is kind of irrelevant.

Which is nothing that I did. In fact, the accusation that I have closely resembles making me into a caricature.

I fully well know and accept that. I have no idea why you think I don’t.

I have a lot of controversial positions. For example, I don’t think that we should punish police officers for accidental shootings. In the recent case in Oakland, I don’t think the officer deserved any punishment whatsoever.

You are awfully quick to assume large numbers of things about me based on very little. You might want to think about that, and how that applies to your own line of logic.